(today's entry fueled by badger legion)
during my final semester of law school at the illustrious seton hall university, i took a class called "advanced topics in sports law." our adjunct professor was this big-time sports attorney in manhattan; the dude knew everything there is to know about the NBA from a technical standpoint (and from a fan perspective, also) but wasn't the most effective educator.
anyhow, for those of you familiar with ABA requirements of law schools, this class satisfied an "advanced writing requirement;" in other words, what would be a journal note or a publishable-quality article on a legal topic. about five weeks before the semester began, the NBA bought the new orleans hornets, which piqued my legal curiosity. four months later, i had a zillion endnotes and a few thousand words on the razor's edge the NBA owners are walking between collusion and "investing" with their ownership of the hornets.
this is the article i wrote. for those of you in the legal field, you'll note that there are no hard conclusions other than that what the league is doing with NOH has a high potential for illegality. stern's citation of "basketball reasons" when blocking the initial CP3 trade to LAL goes, i think, to my point. if you're not into legal stuff, the piece is going to be pretty boring--even if you are, it's still pretty dry. but i think it might be a point worth considering. enjoy.